"Michael S. Lorrey" wrote:
> I'm all for it, so long as the opposing side does too. I try to never initiate
It is? Where does it say that?
> these things, but to permit unanswered inanities from the controller's side on a
> list that is purportedly of libertarian bent is inconcionable.
I'm certainly not a libertarian, I think they are dangerous fanatics, but I'm on this list.
Besides: libertarianism is a *current* political philosophy, and I would
argue there are better fora for discussion of current events.
> BTW: Guns are, in fact, technology.
But the Gun Debate is, in fact, politics.
> Not politically correct technology, but
> technology nontheless.
> Those that tolerate supression of such a mundane
> technology like guns cannot cry and whine when the really usefull technologies
> get banned by the same tyrants.
Of course they bloody well can.
> When evil men conspire, free men must associate.
Blah blah yet more bullshit rhetoric. Can't help yourself, can you?
Thank you for making everyone's point once again.
Dwayne
--
mailto:ddraig@pobox.com http://i.am/dwayne
"the cricher we kno as dwayne is only the projection
into our dimension of something much larger and wirder."
---clae@pa.ausom.net.au
....return....to....the....source....