Re: Yeah, guns and guns and guns and guns

dwayne (
Wed, 02 Jun 1999 18:25:29 +1000

"Michael S. Lorrey" wrote:

> I'm all for it, so long as the opposing side does too. I try to never initiate
> these things, but to permit unanswered inanities from the controller's side on a
> list that is purportedly of libertarian bent is inconcionable.

It is? Where does it say that?

I'm certainly not a libertarian, I think they are dangerous fanatics, but I'm on this list.

Besides: libertarianism is a *current* political philosophy, and I would argue there are better fora for discussion of current events.

> BTW: Guns are, in fact, technology.

But the Gun Debate is, in fact, politics.

> Not politically correct technology, but
> technology nontheless.
> Those that tolerate supression of such a mundane
> technology like guns cannot cry and whine when the really usefull technologies
> get banned by the same tyrants.

Of course they bloody well can.

> When evil men conspire, free men must associate.

Blah blah yet more bullshit rhetoric. Can't help yourself, can you?

Thank you for making everyone's point once again.



"the cricher we kno as dwayne is only the projection
into our dimension of something much larger and wirder."