In a message dated 5/27/99 4:56:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
joedees@bellsouth.net writes:
<< > My point was made from an individualistic standpoint. An individual
takes
Well, I'm sure I don't need to mention the bells and whistles that go off
when I read or hear " good of us all" : )
As to whether there is no other way, I'm not so sure. I haven't done a large
amount of study on the issue, so my objection to gov enforcement of such bans
basically rests on my previous post's points and a few other things that I
won't list right now (tho I suppose I will later if asked : ). But I'd like
to hear why you think there is no other way.
> action for an individual's life. Laws are not individual action, they are
> systematic violence (as I thinkwas pointed out previously). I do agree
that
> it is bad when the category of people you write get guns....but I
definitely
> disagree with your methods (law).
>
It needs to be done for the good of all of us and there ain't no other
way. >>
I'll confess here that I'm coming from an anarchist perspective, so you can better iunderstand my points.
William