Re: Gender importance (was Future Relationships)

Spike Jones (
Sat, 24 Apr 1999 09:48:36 -0700

Scott Badger wrote:

> Eliezer wrote:
> ...
> > "these terms aren't very well-defined, sounds like more New Age
> psychobabble".
> >
> Once again, this instrument has been used by respected academicians in
> hundreds of studies that have appeared in scores of peer-reviewed journals.

Amazing. Seems like it would seriously reduce the credibility of the paper.

> No one is saying that's how it should be, and only
> you appear outraged.

Hmmmm. Outrage. Masculine trait. {8^D
Kidding! Bygones. spike