--------------5C62F96EC365557F6126F0F1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Danny Yavuzkurt wrote: [space junk]... this could be a serious > obstacle to our > >development as a space-faring species.. > Jonathan Reeves wrote: > Absolutely. And a waste of resources - we've spent a lot of money > getting the stuff up there we might as well try and use it, rather > than let it float around endangering shipping.>
Many, just not necessarily practical ones.
The problem is that everything is in different orbits. No one has figured out how to use a chunk of debris that flies past every once in a long while at several thousand meters per second. I had a notion at one time of trying to modify the orbit of a piece of a comet, to place it into earth orbit, then use this large chunk of ice to capture bits of orbitting debris. Turns out this approach is no more practical than the other ideas. spike--------------5C62F96EC365557F6126F0F1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Danny Yavuzkurt wrote: [space junk]... this could be a serious obstacle to ourMany, just not necessarily practical ones. The problem is
>development as a space-faring species..
Jonathan Reeves wrote:
Absolutely. And a waste of resources - we've spent a lot of money getting the stuff up there we might as well try and use it, rather than let it float around endangering shipping.Any ideas?