Re: HIV=/=AIDS video
Fri, 7 Mar 1997 00:11:48 -0500 (EST)

In a message dated 97-03-05 11:37:36 EST, you write:

> "A story will appear in Science, Nature, or the New York Times, stating
> that biologist Peter Duesberg is receiving increased respect in the
> scientific community for his view that AIDS is not caused by HIV." >>

That would not work. IMO you need HIV to be 100% proven wrong as even one
single cause of AIDS . . . that is . . . to satisfy Duesberg's claim that HIV
has no role, not one, 100% _no_ role in causing _any_ form of AIDS.

He says HIV is 100% on the wrong track.