<<
> I wonder if the "individualist" (a well balanced, worldly individual who
can
> be in many situations) can be seen by others and not misunderstood.
Nope. Not a chance. If they understood, they would be one also.
>>
This is not quite the response I had hoped for, in other words, it's an "us
against them" scenario. In assuming that I meant "others" was some kind of
collective, did you not miss a fundamental issue, which is individuality
itself as a given?