> Whew! That was a big 'un. I won't go through your arguments, some of
> which make valid points, some of which are beside the point,as far as I
> am concerned. It still seems to me that your concept of functionality
> is parasitic on the concept of truth.
>
I believe this is John K Clark's argument also. It is only so if we
insist on reverting to the concept of truth in order to explain the
functional system.
> I don't think it would be very useful to carry on much beyond this point,
> as we just seem to be repeating ourselves!
Agreed. Will nip it in the bud and at least for now, agree to disagree.
Cheers,
-- Gregory Houston vertigo@triberian.com 816.561.1524