Eivind Berge <eivber@online.no> On Feb 7 1997 Wrote:
>> Me:
>>A being has free will if and only if he cannot predict what he
>>will do next.
>Eivind:
>One thing is still unclear to me about this definition of free will.
>If things are random, do you still consider it free will?
Yes, if things are random then I certainly can't predict my own behavior,
so I see no need to change my definition. Of course, we know that everything
can't be entirely random , otherwise Science wouldn't work.
John K Clark johnkc@well.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQCzAgUBMvwI0X03wfSpid95AQEDJQTwiLO9nbG72MVQtft6ZKMsRv7Q62Ejod04
oMAmjcFZ1QPmGHBqxKb5gTTzwaSbe2HbSZBu3Ma2OQlJr64S9OVJYtnOipkQtUsG
R6+rPiwhmkp/Q9Spqu5UQQf9RKqkEr03Uf7kss8JMovIeCbfjX9Pq7xsEuY4KfwV
WTXIoq/9KeQxX/aLSjUu9WAFWfobS8o9UOaUNAGxMWvGucCZi+k=
=a57K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----