Re: true abundance?

From: Spike Jones (spike66@attglobal.net)
Date: Sun Jan 28 2001 - 22:16:54 MST

Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Previous message: Michael B. Hubbard: "New Reuters Story on Molecular Tech"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Spike Jones wrote: even the most inferior examples of womanhood
> > would be well protected from those who would do them harm.
>
> Samantha Atkins wrote: What do you mean by "inferior examples of womanhood"?
> GRRRRRR....

I mean examples of womanhood who are serving life without
parole. Expect *all* such would be inferior examples of
womanhood indeed.

Goodness, everyone seems to be in a serious mood today.
{8-] spike

Next message: Michael M. Butler: "Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Previous message: Michael B. Hubbard: "New Reuters Story on Molecular Tech"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:26 MDT