Samantha Atkins wrote:
> Hardware is only part of the story. Where is the software? Who is
> developing it? On what schedule? With what deliverables allowing
Um, do you see any breathtaking progress in software productivity,
plus a silver bullet to the complexity threshold emerging within
the next few decades, outside of evolutionary algorithm field?
If yes, I'd like to see pointers, because I'm apparently missing
that hot new stuff fermenting somewhere.
I wish software people would stop seeing the world as made of
nails. The neuronal/numerical modelers/ALifers are those most
likely to suceed, not the Comp.Sci./AI people. Unless they can
whip up a couple of new paradigms, pronto.
> tracking of progress?
I wonder why you allocate any of your attention to this particular
project. It is not even vapourware yet.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:20 MDT