Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now

From: Stewart Brand (sb@gbn.org)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:44:28 MST

Next message: Russell Whitaker: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Update on Keith Henson's Scientology trial..."
In reply to: Russell Whitaker: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Reply: Emlyn: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 7:20 PM +0000 1/16/01, Russell Whitaker wrote:
>It's encouraging that you're taking the time to respond
>to statements forwarded to this list, so thanks, but...
>all I'm asking of you is to disambiguate your statement
>above, to assure that the inevitable disagreements
>with it are disagreements with your _actual_ position.

What might be the difference between a 22 year old 22-year-old and a
220 year old 22-year-old?

Next message: Russell Whitaker: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Update on Keith Henson's Scientology trial..."
In reply to: Russell Whitaker: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Reply: Emlyn: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:19 MDT