Re: Considering standard of living (was Re: Land of let's only talk about whats wrong with the US)

From: Matt Welland (matt@essentialgoods.com)
Date: Sun Aug 24 2003 - 10:34:22 MDT

  • Next message: Barbara Lamar: "RE: The Extropian Menu Challenge [was: Land of let's only talk about whats wrong with the US]"

    *sigh*, seek first to understand...

    On Sunday 24 August 2003 01:44 am, Spike wrote:
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Matt Welland
    >
    >
    > ...This thread strikes an interesting cord for me. In my opinion one of
    > the
    > unaddressed (and unintended) consequences of unbridled capitalism(*) is
    > that
    > over time natural resources, i.e. land, slowly ends up in the hands of a
    > few...
    >
    >
    > On the contrary, this consequence is intended. This
    > demonstrates the beauty and power of unbridled capitalism.
    > Matt, when wealth is evenly spread over the population, it
    > is just money. But when it is concentrated in the hands
    > of a few, then it becomes CAPITAL and it takes on a certain
    > POWER to create new wealth and make things happen. This is
    > because when money does concentrate, notice that it always
    > seems to fall into the hands of those who know how to USE
    > the capital to create more wealth, to the benefit of everyone,
    > whether by creating jobs or by creating products to be
    > purchased by the proletariat.
    >
    > Contrast this to unbridled communism, which destroys the
    > value of land, since the government cannot be trusted to
    > not seize the land on a whim (so why pay much for it?).
    > Communism destroys wealth by reducing incentive to struggle
    > and take risks. Take away the rewards of competition,
    > and people will not compete. If people do not compete,
    > they do not achieve excellence. They eventually get to
    > where they achieve practically nothing, living in a dingy
    > gray hell, struggling for mediocrity but not getting there.
    > Russia will likely not recover from the curse of communism
    > before the singularity.
    >
    >
    >
    > ...Carried to its inevitable consequence all the land is owned by a few
    > very
    > rich people who literally can deny life to the remaining population...
    >
    >
    >
    > It would work that way except for the fact that land
    > is not a critical resource anymore. In fact most
    > land is actually a liability. Land in cities has a
    > great deal of value, and is increasing. Intellectual
    > property carries value and is increasing. Farmland? Nah,
    > it's just dirt, and the tax structure of the U.S. is
    > making it harder all the time to make money from it.
    >
    > spike

    -- 
    Be strong, have patience, pay attention and live well.
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 24 2003 - 10:49:58 MDT