From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Mon Aug 18 2003 - 10:47:25 MDT
In a message dated 8/18/2003 11:23:00 AM Central Standard Time,
natashavita@earthlink.net writes: List administration looks at the facts and follows the
rules. Simply. Mike got a warning for attacks and he continued. He was
removed. If this is a problem for anyone on this list, either deal with it or not.
But to continue harping on it and whining about it and trying to further
problems, it is not productive to anyone, including Mike Lorrey.
Natasha,
Please don't ban me from the list -- I sent my resignation in nearly a
week ago. You said, "Mike got a warning for attacks and he continued. He
was removed." Mike made some attacks based on matters of opinion, etc. but they
were kept on the level of content. Any personal comments he ever made pale
compared to the personal attacks conducted by others or if compared to the
chortling that occured on this list when he was banned. Let me make it plain,
compared to his critics the man has been a gentleman.
You also said, "If this is a problem for anyone on this list, either
deal with it or not. But to continue harping on it and whining about it and
trying to further problems,..." I have dealt with it. So have a number of
others -- in one fashion or another we have departed because the uneven handling
of the list has sickened us.
So why am I replying? Because I consider it despicable to continue
attacking Mike in his absence. As he isn't here to defend himself I have spoken
on his behalf.
Now, do your worse.
Ron h
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 18 2003 - 10:58:33 MDT