Re: Political labels (was: neocons (WAS IRAQ: Weapons of Mass Delusion))

From: Olga Bourlin (fauxever@sprynet.com)
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 15:42:05 MDT

  • Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Political labels (was: neocons (WAS IRAQ: Weapons of Mass Delusion))"

    From: "Mike Lorrey" <mlorrey@yahoo.com>

    > "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" is such a cop out. Do you think
    > that monarchists should bring the monarchy back to Italy? Perhaps the
    > Pope should rule Italy like he used to? Or the Spanish? Perhaps the
    > Nazis should run Germany once more...

    Do you mean that only *some* people are entitled to their opinion - and
    that, depending on the opinion - some other people are not? How would you
    suggest silencing the people with whom you disagree?

    IMO "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" is not a copout. That statement
    does not indicate that all opinions are *worthy* of respect, but only that
    one's entitlement to make those opinions is respected. I've observed that
    many people (I'm not saying this about you, Mike, necessarily) seem to think
    that "respect" means sanctioning any and all opinions.

    > There are some opinions which, while people are entitled to them,
    > cannot be permitted to find fertile ground to take root in reality.
    >
    There already are opinions which have found fertile ground in *reality,*
    even though the taproot from which they sprouted is based in *unreality.*
    That is to say, crackpot ideas are already here and growing abundantly.
    (I'll stop right here, as this dialogue is taking on the characteristics of
    Peter Sellers' character, Chance the Gardener).

    Olga



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 08 2003 - 15:52:26 MDT