From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sat May 17 2003 - 03:49:01 MDT
Storms were not always identified, in part because even though they reached
the ground, they didn't hit areas that were populated. Now that Americans
live in a more densely populated nation, and the suburbs and exurbs have been
extended; more areas have been subject to damage. Hence the swirled debri is
exhibited. Secondly, advanced doppler has allowed tornado identification,
much more readilly, whereas, before doppler tornado existance is now
verified. The info is still skewed and the left is thrawting metorology and
climatology for its own ends. The Right can do this also, its our job to
declaim this also.
Harvey Storm Newstrom asked:
<<Are you aware that tornados are defined as funnel clouds that actually
reach
the ground? Doppler Radar helps us detect cloud rotation for advance
warning, but they do not help us determine whether a touchdown has actually
occurred. This is done by a site visit to ascertain the damage on the
ground. (Don't you watch the Weather Channel?)
So, no, it is not explainable by Doppler radar. If it were, I would expect
the graph to be relatively flat with steps at the point that radar and later
Doppler radar were deployed. This is not reflected in the historical data,
which instead shows a definite incline before and after Doppler radar.--
Harvey Newstrom, CISSP, IAM, GSEC, IBMCP
<www.HarveyNewstrom.com> <www.Newstaff.com>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 17 2003 - 04:01:55 MDT