Re: spreading democracy (was: Bush budget has 0 dollars for Afghanistan)

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 11:23:20 MST

  • Next message: Natasha Vita-More: "NYC Symposium "World Futures: The Science of Humanity in the Epoch of Technology""

    In a message dated 2/18/2003 11:30:11 AM Central Standard Time,
    mez@apexnano.com writes: The rise of fundamentalist Islam in Iran can be
    directly traced to our support of a regime that repressed the people and left
    fundamentalist Islamic groups as the few willing and able to resist the
    dictator we'd installed.

    Is it really? I know we did participate in the rise of the Shah to some
    extent. But are you underestimating the deep desire of Moslems for a state
    that is ruled by Moslem law. I know some pretty moderate Moslems that deeply
    and sincerely believe that Moslem law is superior to secular rule. Have you
    noticed that the Moslem countries almost invariably split between a strongman
    dictator and Moslem law. If any of the Moslem countries have secular
    governments I am not entirely certain of that fact. I hear that Turkey does.
     Perhaps that is true.
           But when I go to my moderate Moslem friends and we discuss that area I
    missed a point for a long time. For example, when I pointed out that the
    reigning Pakistani government was a dictator they shrugged and were totally
    accepting of his reign. I finally got the point. They seem to visualize
    governments as either dictatorships or as Moslem law. When we discuss Saudi
    government they become ecstatic over what a great Moslem the King is and all
    the things he does that proves he is an humble believing Moslem. I don't
    argue with them as it is their country we are discussing and they can govern
    it anyway they wish to, but it is obvious that a democratic secular
    government is a total nonstarter. They don't even seem to conceive of the
    possibility of ruling themselves.
           What is going to happen? I notice that Mohammed was born roughly six
    hundred years after Jesus. When I look at their religious expression I seem
    to draw an equivalence with where we were about six hundred years ago.
           In addition according to what I read this globe called Earth has two
    mass movements underway. First, we seem to have an approaching spike or
    singularity. Second there is some evidence that we are in the early stages
    of another renaissance. I believe that Thomas Eastman's Lexus and the Olive
    Tree is one expression of the renaissance.
           My hope is that out of the turmoil of a renaissance or the singularity
    we will be able to spread the memes to find peace.
           I seem to argue with Mez about Afghanistan but I do believe he is
    asking the right questions. If I understand him correctly he is asking about
    an "exit strategy." Mez has his own ideas & that is fine. In my own
    opinion, having people kill us is also a non-starter. In my effort to get
    along with Moslems I take a cue straight out of Thomas Merton. "If we start
    to contrast Islam and Christianity and try to figure out which is right we
    can keep a fight going forever. If we get down to cases and simply ask how
    do you do this, what is your view on this, without an attempt to refute or
    debate each other we can both learn." I put that in quotes because I do say
    that in discussion. I haven't been rejected yet for saying so. If
    Christianity doesn't suit you you can substitute Eastern & Western or any
    phrase you please.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 11:26:04 MST