Re: What is not accounted for in IRAQ

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 13:30:47 MST


Dickey, Michael F wrote:
> Mike Lorrey said:
>
>>>
>>>Ditto on rules of evidence as above. There is in fact evidence of
>>>concealment in that significant quantities of chemical and
>>
>>biotoxins
>>
>>>known to be in inventory in 1998 are not accounted for in Iraq's
>>
>>most
>>
>>>recent Declaration to the Security Council. They have disappeared
>>
>>from
>>
>>>the tally, and Iraq refuses to disclose what happened to them.
>>>
>>
>
> Samantha responded:
>
>>Where precisely did you get this information?
>
>
> To which Mike Lorrey said:
> "Where millions of other informed citizens get it: cable news, the
> newspapers, and the internet. Hans Blix stated these facts before the
> Security Council (as did the US administration) after Iraq released its
> Declaration to the UNSCOM."
>
> Samantha, I can not seem to find a response on your part to this
> information.
>

As I said. I am done arguing about this insanity.

-s.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:03 MST