Re: Property [was Re: The Education Function]

Michael Lorrey (
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:31:03 -0500

Samael wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Lorrey <>
> Do you always retreat to ad hominem attacks when you fail to attack someones
> ideas?

Only when I've fairly exposed the ludicrousness of someone's ideas and they still are too dense to get the hint.

> >Rather than just bitching about how property is theft, I suggest you
> propose a
> >detailed workable system under which resources are maximally utilized to
> benefit
> >all, given that all resources originally belong to nobody. If you can't
> give a
> >sufficient answer then please shut up with your socialist nonsense.
> Already did so some tiem ago. Since the only objections were that 'it
> involves stealing', which I have already shown I don't believe, I assume you
> agreed with it in other respects.

Since it involves stealing and depends on stealing in order to work then I cannot agree with any part of it.

Mike Lorrey