> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Lorrey <email@example.com>
> Do you always retreat to ad hominem attacks when you fail to attack someones
Only when I've fairly exposed the ludicrousness of someone's ideas and they still are too dense to get the hint.
> >Rather than just bitching about how property is theft, I suggest you
> propose a
> >detailed workable system under which resources are maximally utilized to
> >all, given that all resources originally belong to nobody. If you can't
> give a
> >sufficient answer then please shut up with your socialist nonsense.
> Already did so some tiem ago. Since the only objections were that 'it
> involves stealing', which I have already shown I don't believe, I assume you
> agreed with it in other respects.
Since it involves stealing and depends on stealing in order to work then I cannot agree with any part of it.