> Basically, my viewpoint is that there are both rights and properties that
> are *intangible*. Our legal system very clearly recognizes this. Anyone
> with a passing interest or familiarity with the law must agree. Also,
> standard business doctrine and practices also recognize that there are
> *intangible* business assets. Anyone with a passing interest in business
> must agree.
>
> So, I ask, for *starters*, where is the "mainstream" libertarian recognition
> of the *intangible* aspects of property and rights?
How are we supposed to answer a question you can't even ask clearly?
Can you give us an example of what you're talking about, and how you
think libertarians and/or Extropians are ignoring it? I'm not mind
reader--spell it out for me. And if your can't, I suspect that says
something about the idea itself.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:33 MDT