Adrian Tymes wrote:
> I currently work for a subsidiary of West Legal Group, the megacorp that
> owns the copyright on the reference system most US lawyers use to refer
> to US laws and cases. Or, in short: they think they own the law in the
> US, and they're arguably right from a certain point of view.
Well, they own all the page breaks and line numbers, anyway! [obscure Westlaw copyright joke]
> I figured this might be a good way to pump money into practical AI
> development, not to mention start automating away a sector that already
> has far too many people working in it - changing things to a legal code,
> as programmers understand the word "code", and hopefully reducing the
> costs of being sued for something one did not commit (which, in and of
> itself, seems to be one of the biggest factors stifling research and
> experimentation, at least in the US). But unless I can get past the
> interface problem (different interface? different product?), no dice in
> this approach.
> Does anyone here has any practical suggestions on how to solve this
Only one: no cute bendy paperclips with speech balloons.
However: chat up Greg Burch next time he's in the States
with two spare minutes to rub together. He might laugh, or cry...
or say something useful.
MMB is reachable via butler at comp dash lib dot o r g * My moronic mnemonic for smart behavior: "DICKS" == * * diplomacy, integrity, courage, kindness, skepticism. *
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:32 MDT