RE: Useless hypotheses

From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Mon Dec 17 2001 - 06:58:02 MST

Next message: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Sincere Questions on Identity"
Previous message: Kai Becker: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Useless hypotheses"
Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Useless hypotheses"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Useless hypotheses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

J. R. Molloy wrote,
> From: "Harvey Newstrom" <mail@HarveyNewstrom.com>
> > What exact definition of "mind" do you object find to be nonsense?
>
> Yes, that's part of the problem, isn't it?
> There's no exact definition of "mind."

Are you saying that you can't define exactly what it is you dismiss as
useless? That you dismiss these hypothesis because you don't understand
them, not because you understand them and disagree with them?

--
Harvey Newstrom, CISSP <www.HarveyNewstrom.com>
Principal Security Consultant, Newstaff Inc. <www.Newstaff.com>
Board of Directors, Extropy Institute <www.Extropy.org>
Cofounder, Pro-Act <www.ProgressAction.org>

Next message: Harvey Newstrom: "RE: Sincere Questions on Identity"
Previous message: Kai Becker: "Re: some U.S. observations and notes"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Useless hypotheses"
Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Useless hypotheses"
Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Useless hypotheses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:27 MDT