> > I once thought about the possibility of a gestural language for
> > probability that would go along with spoken language. For example,
> > holding your hands at a certain height depending on whether you were
> > unsure, sure, or very sure of something. Or holding up a certain number
> > of fingers to indicate how many minutes of explanation you were skipping
> > over in a given statement, with this tactic possibly being useful when
> > forced to give oversimplified statements in a realtime debate or on
> > television.
Existing Ameslan is quite expressive in its use of space, movement,
and other things a written/spoken language cannot be--no need to
reinvent that feature. One frequently expresses degrees of things
by relative spatial position of signs, or perhaps by just signing
more forcefully or flamboyantly.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:22 MDT