Mike Lorrey wrote:
>
> Charlie Stross wrote:
> >
> > I mean, would *you* want to visit a European state where the
> > government had passed regulations saying that basically you
> > relinquished all rights to due process of law by entering their
> > borders, and if they felt like it they could have you arrested,
> > tried by a military tribunal, and executed on the spot with no
> > appeal?
>
> If I were attempting to overthrow that government or even merely trying
> to engage in a propaganda war to destroy the hypothetical high trust
> society of that hypothetical european country, I would expect such
> measures as a matter of course.
Erm, "propaganda war" ???
You'd *execute people* because of what they said? Aren't you a fan of
free speech?
> My revolutionary cabal's plans may even
> *require* that such measures be enacted, on the theory that they would
> engender mistrust and resentment enough to engender further support from
> the "useful idiots" in that part of the local intelligentsia who engage
> in arguments of moral equivilancy in order to shround their lack of
> responsibility as citizens.
Isn't part of that responsibility enduring that government doesn't get
out of hand? Isn't this about to get -way- out of hand?
It seems to me that while no one is supporting the terrorists, an awful
lot of people find the idea of these military courts deeply disturbing.
Dwayne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:22 MDT