Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Sun Nov 25 2001 - 16:47:50 MST

Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "NEWS: Intel invents beakthrough in transistor design"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"J. R. Molloy" wrote:
>
> From: "Samantha Atkins" <samantha@objectent.com>
> > I am not whining and I am tired of your yelling, bullying BS.
> > Stop it!
>
> But you started it, which is why I have had most of your messages
> automatically deleted.
> Why do you engage this list? Do you intend to proselytize or to disrupt.
> Either way, you seem to have failed laughably.

Whoever "started it" you have as much responsibility as I for
ending it. What will you do?

- s.

Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "NEWS: Intel invents beakthrough in transistor design"
Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:22 MDT