Mike Lorrey wrote:
> "J. R. Molloy" wrote:
> > From: <CurtAdams@aol.com>
> > > Are you saying terrorism is OK if it works?
> > > Or if it's done in a "good cause"?
> > If it ends a World War, as the bombing of Hiroshima/Nagasaki did, it ain't
> > that bad.
> > ...are you saying that you oppose good causes?
> > How lame.
> The logical fallacy here is the assumption that the inhabitants of
> Hiroshima and Nagasaki are to be considered 'non-combatants' under the
> Geneva Conventions.
I have not seen a good argument that they were combatants under
the terms of the Geneva Convention.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:21 MDT