Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Nov 25 2001 - 09:57:54 MST

Next message: Chuck Kuecker: "Re: ELIEZER(thanks!) on the ethics of using weapons of mass destruction..."
Previous message: J Corbally: "Operation Enduring Consumption"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: "Samantha Atkins" <samantha@objectent.com>
> everyone not in your
> US club is quite justified in despising you as an immoral curr.

This is the kind of comment that prompted me to put you in the Blocked Senders
list months ago.

Next message: Chuck Kuecker: "Re: ELIEZER(thanks!) on the ethics of using weapons of mass destruction..."
Previous message: J Corbally: "Operation Enduring Consumption"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Reply: Samantha Atkins: "Re: List Rules Part 1 (Was: Ad hominem? I think not.)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:21 MDT