On Saturday, November 24, 2001 9:44 PM Michael M. Butler butler@comp-lib.org
wrote:
> Significant sidebar:
>
> Lots of people don't keep this distinction in mind, and it's a useful one,
> so at the risk of sounding too much like an armchair saber rattler or
wargamer.
> There is an important notional distinction between "covert" and
"clandestine".
>
> Covert: an operation or event whose source is concealed or deniable.
> A failed covert activity gets outed--and either categorically denied or
> eventually acknowledged, sometimes (eventually) both. The objective is
> to sanitize/sterilize the identity or allegiance of the operators, not
> the operation. Examples abound.
>
> Clandestine: an operation whose very existence _remains concealed_
effectively.
> The world at large, and the target in particular, stays unaware that the
action
> or event in question ever took place. Hypothetical example: US special ops
> stealing or sabotaging suitcase nukes.
Okay, I'll buy your distinction. However, most of what are put into the
first bin -- covert operations -- are actually only covert from US public.
If the CIA is funding or training a local group to overthrow some government
wherever, usually the people in that country know the US government is
behind it. (See _Informing Statecraft: Intelligence for a New Century_ by
Angelo Codevilla for more on this. My review of it is at
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/IP1_Know.html)
Cheers!
Daniel Ust
http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:21 MDT