Re: Ad hominem? I think not.

From: nedkelly@leary.csoft.net
Date: Thu Nov 22 2001 - 00:48:04 MST

Next message: nedkelly@leary.csoft.net: "Re: American "imperialism""
Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Folding@home 2.0"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Next in thread: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Non-member submission from [nedkelly@leary.csoft.net]

>
> Conformity by any other name.....

I'm all for it.

Dwayne

Next message: nedkelly@leary.csoft.net: "Re: American "imperialism""
Previous message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Folding@home 2.0"
In reply to: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Next in thread: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:20 MDT