> Actually, since I assume you are indirectly choosing me as a
> case in point, ...
That's one of the problems here. Along with the emotional
mudslinging here is the equally bad habit of taking personally
statements that aren't explicitly personal. If I make a
personal comment, it will have a name on it. When I make a
comment on an idea, I don't appreciate it when others interpret
it personally, or impute motives to me that aren't stated, or
assume I'm attacking an idea other than the one presented.
Waht I say is precisely what I mean, in plain fucking English.
No more, no less. I may not always be clear, and I may not
always be right, but I try never to be covert. That may not
apply to everyone here, but it certainly should, and we should
not assume covert motives without evidence.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <email@example.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:20 MDT