META: list going to the dogs, again, lala

• Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Reply: Michael M. Butler: "CONC. Re: META: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Reply: Adrian Tymes: "CONC: META: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, J. R. Molloy wrote:

> Well, there are two distinct ways to use this word "idiot."

Went away for 3 weeks, so unsubbed, came back, the list is still in moron
mode.

Name calling, post after post about posts about namecalling, what happened
with you people? Keeping a list alive and healthy is hard work, and it is
so easy to ruin. You're succeeding nicely so far.

Each worsening of list atmosphere drives away content carriers, usually
irreversibly. It's a positive autofeedback process, so don't allow it to
start. Please.

I don't have anything else to say, so I'm following my own advice and shut
my mouth.

• Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• Previous message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "Re: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Reply: J. R. Molloy: "Re: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Reply: Michael M. Butler: "CONC. Re: META: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Reply: Adrian Tymes: "CONC: META: list going to the dogs, again, lala"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:20 MDT