On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:51:10AM -0800, J. R. Molloy wrote:
> From: "Anders Sandberg" <asa@nada.kth.se>
> > I would also add epistemic relativism: there might exist an objective
> > morality, but we can't know with certainty which morality is right.
>
> If, as noted scientists have theorized, morality derives from biology, then
> our decisions about what is right also derive from biology. Plus, the tendency
> to add epistemic relativism may have its congenital correlatives.
But the epistemic relativist would just ask why you think the naturally
evolved morality is the objectively true one. I think you and me would
say something along the lines of "because it works", but that would not
convince the relativist. And that we might have a predisposition
towards relativism (which I doubt) doesn't mean it is wrong, just as a
predisposition towards certain kinds of morality doesn't mean they are
right.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:18 MDT