John Clark writes:
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/11/011101060839.htm
>
>
> begin 666 ScienceDaily Magazine -- Scientists Expect To See Miniature Black Holes.url
> M6T1%1D%53%1=#0I"05-%55),/6AT=' Z+R]W=W<N<V-I96YC961A:6QY+F-O
> M;2]R96QE87-E<R\R,# Q+S$Q+S Q,3$P,3 V,#@S.2YH=&T-"@T*6TEN=&5R
> M;F5T4VAO<G1C=71=#0I54DP]:'1T<#HO+W=W=RYS8VEE;F-E9&%I;'DN8V]M
> M+W)E;&5A<V5S+S(P,#$O,3$O,#$Q,3 Q,#8P.#,Y+FAT;0T*36]D:69I960]
> 4.#!%,4-#0CA&0S8R0S$P,3 U#0H`
> `
> end
I'm not sure where the uuencoded block at the end comes from, maybe an
artifact of cut-and-paste with some browser?
John's article from last month at
http://www.lucifer.com/exi-lists/extropians/2403.html describes the
physical model behind this. You would only see black holes if the
universe has multiple spatial dimensions, which has to be considered
pretty questionable at this point. I don't see much that is new in this
press release from UCSB, I think they are still talking about the same
CERN accelerators that we discussed last month?
Hal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:17 MDT