Samantha Atkins wrote:
>
> Mike Lorrey wrote:
> >> > That is very offensive and utterly uncalled for. I am not any
> > > stripe of collectivist or socialist or "victim" mentality type
> > > of person. I demand an apology.
> >
> > You've repeatedly been ranting the standard socialist/leftarchist
> > anti-capitalism party line, with only a few caveats to deviate yourself
> > from the standard leftilist. I'm not the only one who has noted your
> > repeated preference for left wing dogma. If you renounce those stands,
> > then I apologize. Otherwise, none is warranted.
>
> I don't do dogma. I do do considered possibilities for how to
> best organize societies and economies headed toward singularity
> and for how to best avoid being embroiled in senseless wars. I
> don't limit myself to any flavor of dogma including that most
> favorited by yourself, in the process. If you can't tell the
> difference and choose only to see me in terms of your
> categorical bins then that is your problem, not mine.
>
> Renounce your blinders and presumption. You still owe me an
> apology.
Hiding behind your absolute relativism dogma doesn't help you. It only
assures that you are what John Clark says you are. Relativism is the
last refuge of the indecisive fool.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:17 MDT