> Theft of copyrighted material is theft no matter what those who do
> it say to try and justify it.
Argument-by-definition is argument-by-definition no matter what
irrational minds say to justify it. If you actually have an opinion
on the matter with some _content_, please express it: in what way
is the act of using information "created" by someone else (and
please tell me what the requisite act of creation is) analogous to
the act of taking physical possesion of someone's tangible
property, and how does that analogy justify using force (i.e. law)
against that user?
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:15 MDT