> Why? We would still get cold. Did you mean we would have zero
> privacy? Im already over that.
I don't mean to have my statements construed as supporting privacy. I wish to make the point that such changes to open up full information flow may require a very significant lifestyle change, and so much that we might have our cultural notions turned upside down and might need to set up a new variety of society to function. Not wearing clothes (for the purpose of concealment) would surely qualify as one of such possible changes.
> At some time future we reach the point where anyone can slay
> everyone. At that time, I do not expect anyone would be banging
> the right to privacy drum. As that day approaches, how do we
> decide how much privacy should be ensured? spike
I vote for the Global Mind Link and full disclosure. Meanwhile, we have to consider those unwilling to take part in such an experience, and perhaps setting up a new colony where we can live without worrying about terrorists and other anti-progressive behavior would provide the best solution.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:13 MDT