Re: Continuity check

From: Brian D Williams (talon57@well.com)
Date: Fri Oct 05 2001 - 09:42:00 MDT


>From: Michael Wiik <mwiik@messagenet.com>

>>Brian D Williams <talon57@well.com> wrote:
>>(responding to Rafal Smigrodzki):

>> As I indicated, deliberately murdering unarmed civilians is a
>> definition of cowardice (and a criminal act) in my book

>> As I indicated, they are/were cowards by definition.

>>(responding to Mike Lorrey)

>> You are not what I think you are, you are not even what you
>> think you are, you are what you are.
>
>> People all the time (especially "reporters") are claiming to be
>> "objective" when all they are presenting is a subjective point
>> of view.

>I guess we'll fix it in post.

I don't follow this part.

>It was kinda cool that (in the digest) these two messages followed
>each other.

Clearly the fact that the terrorists are cowards is my opinion and
alot of other peoples opinion as well. It is opinion based on
definition as most opinions are. The opposing side uses different
definitions.

Brian

Member:
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
SBC/Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:12 MDT