From: "John Clark" <jonkc@worldnet.att.net>
>Chomsky has been saying this since 1959 so it proves one other thing,
> you can be a great scientist and a rotten person.
From: "John Clark" <jonkc@worldnet.att.net>
> There is no more reason to waste time reading Chomsky's
> opinion of current events than Einstein's opinions of Chinese cooking.
I agree. Although Chomsky got it right about the brain and language, there's
no more reason to waste time reading Chomsky's opinion of _current events_
than Einstein's opinions of Zionism, or Bertrand Russell's opinions of
pacifism, or Linus Pauling's opinions of nutrition.
The paleontologist Jack Horner recently summed it up by saying, "When I go off
the deep end someday with a weird theory, I want some grad students to shove a
pole in my face and tell me to go fishing."
Chomsky is yet another example of the tragedy of senility.
--- --- --- --- ---
Useless hypotheses, etc.:
consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
analog computing, cultural relativism, GAC, Cyc, Eliza, cryonics, individual
uniqueness, ego, human values, scientific relinquishment
We move into a better future in proportion as science displaces superstition.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:12 MDT