Re: Down With Democracy?

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@datamann.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 08:46:33 MDT


Technotranscendence wrote:
>
> On 03 Oct 2001, 12:13:02 PM J. R. Molloy jr@shasta.com wrote:
> >> Down With Democracy by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
> >> from http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/hermann-hoppe2.html
> >
> > Yes, democracy sucks. That's why we Americans should be glad we live in a
> > Republic rather than a democracy.
>
> I'm not sure how that's any different from Hoppe's usage of the term. To
> him, I believe, there's no difference between a democracy and a republic --
> at least, not at this level of analysis.
>
> What are the important/relevant differences between them in this context?
> Do these speak against Hoppe's claims -- many of which seem based on the
> American example. (E.g., affirmative action.)

Democracy has no checks and balances against the tyranny of the
majority. Republics acknowledge Barnum's Law: "You can fool all the
people some of the time" and insulate against it.
Parliamentary systems are democracies, especially where there is no
written and supermajority controlled constitution.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:12 MDT