On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> I remain undefeated at detecting steganography. I would love to get a real
Hey, some of us have a life, and a dayjob. Give me some more time, will
> challenge that is not trivial to detect. I would even enjoy failing such a
> challenge, because it might signal hope for the development of undetectable
> steganography. Thus far, however, I see no evidence that undetectable
> steganography is even theoretically possible.
Of course it's possible: you have to just substitute the noise in a given
source by a pseudorandom source bearing the same signature. Preparing
proper signature is not trivial, but it's not rocket science, either.
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a>
ICBMTO: N48 04'14.8'' E11 36'41.2'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat May 11 2002 - 17:44:11 MDT