>If there are other recurring "tough questions" I have missed,
>let me know and I'll add them to my list. If you can point me to
>interesting discussions or essays on these topics elsewhere, I
>would be interested as well.
Many people on this list rightly fear and loath the tryanny of the majority over that of the minority. One aspect of this is the tryanny of government over peoples lives. The counter-problem has not had as much air time (perhaps because the rights of an individual are seen - rightly in my opinion - as so important).
The tryanny of the minority over the majority is not as easy to deal with. Do we allow everyone the right to have a pound of plutonium each and ready instructions on how to build a bomb? Do we - as individuals (let's not get into Statist distractions) - have an ethical right to stop this? If yes, then what about nanotech, high powered AI all of which seem to pose even greater risks. Do
Please no flames. I just want to understand how to maximise everyone's freedom here.
best, patrick
Editor: PSYCHE: An International Journal of Research on Consciousness Board Member: The Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/ http://www.phil.vt.edu/ASSC/