Patrick Wilken wrote:
> >Ron Kean <email@example.com> writes:
> >> When you say that 'Every particle has an anti-particle...', do you mean
> >> that there are equal amounts of matter and anti-matter?
> >No, locally (i.e. the known universe) there is much more matter than
> >antimatter - why is one of the big questions in cosmology.
> Weren't there recent experiments that showed that the creation of
> matter/anti-matter was not completely symmetrical (i.e. slightly more
> matter is made for each tonne of anti-matter). Suggesting that there might
> not be any great quantities of anti-matter left in the Universe (known and
> unknown). That we, and everything we see, are just what's left over after
> the rest of the matter/anti-matter destroyed itself.
The problem with these experiments is that they are conducted in a temporally sequential manner. The big bang was not. The fact that the experiment is moving forward in time could have an effect on how much matter and antimatter is produced (it could also have to do with the gravitational gradient field the experiment is conducted in).