"Michael S. Lorrey" <mike@lorrey.com> writes:
> Timothy Bates wrote:
Which area was that? As far as I know, most studies on his brain have
been cellular rather than morphological (he may have hadd a slightly
different number of glial cells; I'll get back to that once I have
finished reading the reviews on the brain effects of enriched
environments, they seem to relate here).
> >
> > He was brilliant, but hardly working in a vacuum.
>
> Just read an article about his brain, that scientists have found that
> there was an area he was missing in his brain that allowed the part
> responsible for mathematical visualization to grow to twice the normal
> size...
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y