> Rob Harris Cen-IT <Rob.Harris@bournemouth.gov.uk> wrote:
> The
> conscious experience of "love" is currently thought to be brought about by
> one substance alone - I forget the name
I'm not sure that these substance(s) are completely known. A quick scan of PubMed indicates that oxytocin and vasopressin have been implicated in social bonding and control of the hypothalmic pituitary adrenal axis. [Psychoneuroendocrinology 1998 23(8):779-818]
As I recall there were some claims that substances in chocolate, perhaps phenylalanine (if memory serves correctly), have been claimed to produce feelings similar to love. However PubMed draws a blank on this so it falls into the rumor catagory... It is certainly true that our knowledge of neurotransmitters is incomplete at this time (but in 5 years or so the story will be much different).
> The question about other species relates to the consciousness question,
> which bugs thinkers the world over. We just don't have the necessary
> technology at present to detect consciousness, so we can't say whether or
> not any other species EXPERIENCE at all.
There was a great video on one of the "pet shows" on TV the other night, showing a small parrot, drawing close to its reflection in a bathroom chrome fixture, screeching "pretty bird, pretty bird...", clearly thinking it was another bird (unless you assume a very narcissistic parrot...). Parrots are supposed to have the intelligence of 3-4 year old humans, so, I would say that "mature" humans, chimpanzees and perhaps a few of the other great apes could be considered self-aware.
Does anyone know at what age children pass the mirror test? [They have to at least be able to focus first, so newborns definately fail.]
Robert