On Mon, 6 Jul 1998 20:20:44 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Fabulich <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Randall R Randall wrote:
>> This seems to me to be a very common
>> mistake. :) The music *isn't* the "same";
>> it is only very similar. That is, they are
>> not really one piece of music, but two,
>> that happen to differ only in location.
>> They do differ, though.
Um...in location, and in that
they are two distinct entities.
>> I will agree with this. There is no way to tell
>> the difference, if you are not aware that there
>> are really two different CDs. Of course, if the
>> CDs themselves are expected to be aware,
>> then the first CD will never know it is "offline",
>> any more than other dead people know that
>> they are dead.
>I feel like you're making the implicit presumption that if there are two
>of something, then they must be different; that two things cannot be the
>same. This seems weird to me.
And the reverse, that two separate things
can really be the same thing (not just two
instances of a class, but identical), seems
extremely odd, to me. :-(
Here's another slant on the same area:
If you loan me a CD, and I take it to my house and copy it, do you now own two
CDs? I would say not, but perhaps you
(and anyone who supports intellectual
property) would say yes? I am confused
as to how your position on IP can agree
with mine (as I have seen that it does)
and yet the most basic concept involved
causes a disagreement... Hm.
Wolfkin. 5CaaHx/ncmWI7mi94lMRbZ5naWfoiAiWyG37UUfee/P ZC4/WXsLu6HZ2yNplrjqpmzdh/VD8dn8sYQqxzR5 40VuAUotLXspclCkQJJLGI4mZ4h4WD36oObV3OEoW
email@example.com | ICQ: 3043097
E-Gold Acct: 100678 @ www.e-gold.com
On a visible but distant shore a new image of man, The shape of his own future, now in his own hands.
| Johnny Clegg _____________________________________________________________________You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]