On Sunday, July 22, 2001 10:17 AM J. R. Molloy firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > Part of the reason I've classified philosophy as useless has to do
> > > the way pancritical rationalism makes it obsolete and irrelevant.
> > This is not an answer to the logic of my argument.
> Which part? The obsolete part, or the irrelevant part?
Where do I argue for philosophy in the article? Where is it irrelevant?
It's not all that long. The fact that you won't answer it leads me to
believe you can't answer it.
See the brief piece that J. R. Molloy fears to answer:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:54 MDT