From: "Technotranscendence" <neptune@mars.superlink.net>
> > Part of the reason I've classified philosophy as useless has to do with
> > the way pancritical rationalism makes it obsolete and irrelevant.
>
> This is not an answer to the logic of my argument.
Which part? The obsolete part, or the irrelevant part?
©¿©¬
Stay hungry,
--J. R.
Useless hypotheses, etc.:
consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
analog computing, cultural relativism, GAC, CYC, and ELIZA
Everything that can happen has already happened, not just once,
but an infinite number of times, and will continue to do so forever.
(Everything that can happen = more than anyone can imagine.)
We won't move into a better future until we debunk religiosity, the most
regressive force now operating in society.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:54 MDT