S.J. Van Sickle [firstname.lastname@example.org] wrote:
>should have crammed the airwaves with broadcasts explaining what we are
>doing and why, and well as tips on how to avoid becoming "collateral
But in order to do that, first the governments involved would have to have known why they were doing it; and in any case, with the world's best-known lier and dog-wagger in charge, why would anyone believe anything that NATO said?