> And again, you're being 'careless and frivolous about facts'. He wasn't
> shot from twenty paces, and if he had been I'd certainly have supported
> a murder conviction. The home owner was holding a .44 magnum revolver --
> which, if you've never shot one, is a *very* big gun -- and shot him from
> a few feet away. You can't seriously claim that he didn't know the guy had
> a gun.
I refer you to my previous post.
Sure, I see guns a lot on TV, but that doesn't mean I'd recognise one if I saw it.
-- mailto:email@example.com http://i.am/dwayne "the cricher we kno as dwayne is only the projection into our dimension of something much larger and wirder." ---firstname.lastname@example.org ....return....to....the....source....