Re: GUNS: Emotional IQ: assumptions and our senses( wsGUNS: Shooting of

dwayne (
Wed, 09 Jun 1999 17:31:50 +1000 wrote:
> And again, you're being 'careless and frivolous about facts'. He wasn't
> shot from twenty paces, and if he had been I'd certainly have supported
> a murder conviction. The home owner was holding a .44 magnum revolver --
> which, if you've never shot one, is a *very* big gun -- and shot him from
> a few feet away. You can't seriously claim that he didn't know the guy had
> a gun.

I refer you to my previous post.

Sure, I see guns a lot on TV, but that doesn't mean I'd recognise one if I saw it.



"the cricher we kno as dwayne is only the projection
into our dimension of something much larger and