Re: Guns [was Re: property Rights]
Joe E. Dees (email@example.com)
Sat, 29 May 1999 18:49:29 -0500
Subject: Re: Guns [was Re: property Rights]
Date sent: Sat, 29 May 1999 15:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Lee Daniel Crocker" <firstname.lastname@example.org (none)>
Organization: Piclab (http://www.piclab.com/)
Send reply to: email@example.com
> > > I don't recall seeing any such post, and I'd honestly like to see
> > > it if one exists. I did see the two URLs from HCI; they present some
> > > arguments (some valid, some not) for why Lott's study might be flawed,
> > > but I have yet to see any actual study that supports the opposite
> > > conclusion, and I assume that if such a study existed, HCI would be
> > > happy to refer to it. The only statistics quoted on HCI are far
> > > less rigorous and complete than Lott's.
> > Just as I said.
> At least I've actually /read/ the arguments on both sides, and
> honestly evaluated them. I have also on more than one occasion
> changed my mind on significant issues of politics and morality.
> I suggest you honestly asses whether or not you can say the same
> things, and whether or not you have any actual evidence that I
> cannot, or are just assuming that I'm lying because of your
> political prejudice.
No, because of yours.
> Lee Daniel Crocker <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html>
> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
> are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
> for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC