>Multivalent logic untangles us from self-reference paradox. What about a
>barber who shaves everyone iff they don't shave themselves? Bivalent logic
>cannot tell us whether or not the barber shaves himself. Multivalent logic
>can resolve the conflict by having the barber shave himself to a certain
>degree.
You miss the point of Russell's Paradox. The barber must not shave himself
to *any least* degree, and yet, as a man of the region, is obliged by law
to be shaved - and nobody else is permitted to shave him (the iff). The
paradox arises in the self-reference loop from the whole sentence back to a
part of the sentence. Fuzzy doesn't apply.
>Believe it or not, there ARE times when one is neither completely right,
>nor completely wrong.
This was not one of them. You were completely wrong. :)
Damien Broderick